State Ex Rel. Jones v. Farrar
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The respondents claim that under Section 8, General- Code, they were entitled to hold over until the election and qualification of their successors, because the relators as officers-elect failed to qualify within the period of time required by law. The respondents rely upon the provisions of Section 7, General Code, as requiring qualification for the office and the provisions of Section 4242, General Code, as fixing the time within which the relators should have given their respective bonds in order to qualify for their respective offices, and the consequence for failure to do so.
Section 7,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Chicago v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
- Hurford v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. BarnellOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. Ellis v. BrownSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- Stiner v. Powells Valley Hardware Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Abate v. Pioneer Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
- In re DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BellmanOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State ex rel. Madsen v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2005
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.