Legal Opinion

In re Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1999No. Nos. 98-50 and 98-98PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCook, J.

The issue certified to this court is “whether the seven-day limit within which a juvenile court must enter its disposition of a child adjudicated as abused, neglected or dependent under R.C. 2151.35 also applies to motions filed by an agency under R.C. 2151.414 prior to the September 1996 amendment to that statute.” We find that the seven-day limit does apply but that it is directory, not mandatory, and that either party may seek to enforce the statutory time requirement through a writ of procedendo.

I

The seven-day limit in question appears in the Revised Code section delimiting the procedure…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. State ex rel. Levin v. City of Sheffield LakeOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Dehler v. SutulaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Miley v. ParrottOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. Jones v. FarrarOhio Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. BellmanOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State ex rel. Jean-Baptiste v. KirschOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In Re Z.R.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State ex rel. Madsen v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API