Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Larkins v. Wilkinson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 24, 1997No. 96-2694PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Per curiam

Larkins asserts that the court of appeals erred in granting Wilkinson’s summary judgment motion and denying the writ. Civ.R. 56(C) provides that before summary judgment may be granted, it must be determined that (1) no genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated, (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and viewing the evidence most strongly in favor of the nonmoving party, that conclusion is adverse to the nonmoving party. State ex rel. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Rimmer-Bey v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Alphonso Samuels v. J. Mockry, G. Hewston, W. Higgins and J. DowdleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. State Ex Rel. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BarnellOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  2. In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Larkins v. WilkinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Morris v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  5. Moore v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API