Legal Opinion

In Re McFarland

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 26, 2004No. 25848PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline matter, Arthur Cecil McFarland (Respondent) has taken exception to the recommendation from the subpanel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct (subpanel) 1 that he be definitely suspended from the practice of law for a period of nine months, with conditions. ■ We find that Respondent’s conduct warrants a lesser sanction than the full panel recommended. Therefore, we impose a public reprimand, with the recommended conditions, effective as of the date of this opinion.

FACTS

This disciplinary matter arises from Respondent’s (1) neglect during the course of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  2. In the Matter of AckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. In Re StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  4. In Re CharlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re GreeneSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. In Re TullisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2007
  3. In Re BraghirolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. In Re SturkeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
  5. In the Matter of Timothy MosesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API