Legal Opinion

In Re Charles

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 19, 2001No. 25377PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The Commission on Lawyer Misconduct filed formal charges against William K. Charles, III (“Respondent”) on May 23, 2000. 1 Respondent did not respond to the charges as required by Rule 24(a), Rules for Disciplinary Enforcement, 2 and, therefore, the charges were deemed admitted. The following formal charges were filed against Respondent:

1) Ann Brawn Matter

Respondent failed to complete work on a deed for his client Ann Brown and failed to communicate with her adequately. Furthermore, Ms. Brown paid Respondent a $90.00 fee which he did not earn. Respondent is now unable to locate Ms. Brown’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. In the Matter of AckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. In the Matter of HinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Matter of BallardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  5. In the Matter of BrunerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re McFarlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API