In Re Charles
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
The Commission on Lawyer Misconduct filed formal charges against William K. Charles, III (“Respondent”) on May 23, 2000. 1 Respondent did not respond to the charges as required by Rule 24(a), Rules for Disciplinary Enforcement, 2 and, therefore, the charges were deemed admitted. The following formal charges were filed against Respondent:
1) Ann Brawn Matter
Respondent failed to complete work on a deed for his client Ann Brown and failed to communicate with her adequately. Furthermore, Ms. Brown paid Respondent a $90.00 fee which he did not earn. Respondent is now unable to locate Ms. Brown’s…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- In Re ChastainSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- In the Matter of AckerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- In the Matter of HinesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- Matter of BallardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- In the Matter of BrunerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re McFarlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004