Legal Opinion

In Re Sturkey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 28, 2008No. 26426PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney disciplinary matter, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) filed formal charges against respondent, O. Lee Sturkey, alleging misconduct in eight different criminal matters. Sturkey failed to answer, and he was found to be in default. After a hearing, both the sub-panel and the full panel of the Commission on Lawyer Conduct recommended that respondent be sanctioned with: a nine-month definite suspen sion; mandatory compliance with a law office management assistance program as a condition of reinstatement; and payment of costs of the proceedings. We impose the recommended…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re McFarlandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  2. In Re StraitSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. In Re MatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  4. In re ShibleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re ToneySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  2. In Re BraghirolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. In Re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  4. In re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  5. In the Matter of Timothy MosesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API