Legal Opinion
Dumas v. Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 14, 1999No. 98 CV 1772-B(AJB), 98 CV 2121-B (AJB)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO STAY CASE PURSUANT TO THE FIRST-TO-FILE RULE; DENYING MOTIONS TO TRANSFER PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE
BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
This Order encompasses three motions bearing on five different cases. First, the League and Player Licensor Defendants 1 in Dumas et al. v. Major League Baseball Properties, et al. (“Dumas ”), case no. 98 CV 1772-B (AJB), and Defendant The Topps Company, Inc. (“Topps”) in Rodriquez et al. v. The Topps Company (“Rodriquez ”), case no. 99 CV 2121-B (AJB), bring motions to dismiss,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Martin v. WilksSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Richards v. Jefferson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Factors Etc., Inc. And Boxcar Enterprises Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc. And Stop and Shop Companies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Intersearch Worldwide, Ltd. v. Intersearch Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Inherent. Com v. Martindale-HubbellDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2006
- Major League Baseball Properties, Inc. v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Dumas v. Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2000
- Rodriquez v. Topps Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.