Legal Opinion
Inherent. Com v. Martindale-Hubbell
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 10, 2006No. C 05-3515 MHPPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Defendant’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, to transfer
PATEL, District Judge.
On July 29, 2005 plaintiff Inherent.com (“Inherent”) filed this action in the Superi- or Court of the State of California against defendants Martindale-Hubbell (“Martin-dale”) and Lexis/Nexis, Inc. (“LexisNexis”) alleging breach of contract and fraudulent acquisition of trade secrets. On August 30, 2005 Martindale and LexisNexis removed the action to this court. Now before the court is the defendants’ motion to dismiss the action pursuant to the first-to-file rule or, in the alternative,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Decker Coal Company v. Commonwealth Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Alltrade, Inc. v. Uniweld Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Kohn Law Group, Inc. v. Auto Parts Manufacturing Mississippi, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI CORP.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Wallerstein v. Dole Fresh Vegetables, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2013
- Adoma v. University of Phoenix, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Costco Wholesale Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.