Legal Opinion
Dumas v. Major League Baseball Properties, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 21, 2000No. 98CV1772-B (AJB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER:(1) VACATING PREVIOUS ORDERS OF MAY 14, 1999 PUBLISHED AT 52 F.Supp.2d 1170 AND 52 F.Supp.2d 1183 NUNC PRO TUNC;(2) DISMISSING PLAINTIFFS’ RICO CLAIM WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND; and(3) DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE ALL PENDENT CLAIMS
BREWSTER, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs herein, alleged residents of New York and California, claim to be purchasers, or the guardian ad litem of purchasers, of trading cards. Plaintiffs allege that they purchased trading cards in the hope of winning “chase” 1 cards, redeemable in bonus cash prizes. Defendants are alleged residents of New York,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Beck v. PrupisSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Steven Price, Bruce Laxer, Lance Kuba, and Jeffrey Fishman, on Behalf of Themselves and All Other Similarly Situated Persons v. Pinnacle Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Jane Doe v. John Roe, and Roe and Roe, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- People Ex Rel. Ellison v. . LavinNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mendoza v. Zirkle Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Mendoza v. Zirkle Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Walters v. Fidelity Mortgage of California, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Hansen v. Ticket Track, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2003
- Hannosh v. SegalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.