Legal Opinion

Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance v. Firemen's Fond Insurance

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1910PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the circuit court of Adams county. Hon. AIoyse H. Wilkinson, Judge. The Globe, etc., Insurance Company, appellant, was plaintiff in the court below; The Firemen’s, etc., Insurance Company, six other insurance companies and divers individuals, appellees, were defendants there. From a judgment sustaining demurrers to the declaration and dismissing the suit the plaintiff appealed to the supreme court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

Read the full summary

From the circuit court of Adams county. Hon. AIoyse H. Wilkinson, Judge. The Globe, etc., Insurance Company, appellant, was plaintiff in the court below; The Firemen’s, etc., Insurance Company, six other insurance companies and divers individuals, appellees, were defendants there. From a judgment sustaining demurrers to the declaration and dismissing the suit the plaintiff appealed to the supreme court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. It is submitted that, at the present stage in the development of the principles of law relating to conspiracies and interference with…

1Opinion of the Court

Mates, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance Company began suit in the circuit court of Adams county against numerous insurance •companies. We deem it unnecessary to name all the companies made defendants to the declaration. The suit is for an alleged tort, and the amount sued for is $50,000. The declaration alleges substantially that plaintiff is engaged in the business of writing fire insurance in the state of Mississippi, having complied with all the laws of the state relative thereto, and being duly licensed; that plaintiff conducts its business…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Delz v. Winfree, Norman & PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Martell v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Employing Printers Club v. Doctor Blosser Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  5. Hunt v. SimondsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Morton Buildings of Nebraska, Inc. v. Morton Buildings, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  3. Hutton v. WattersTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Barber v. StephensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  5. S. C. Posner Co. v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API