Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Cordano

California Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1892No. 14733PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

— This is an action for the enforcement of a material-man’s lien. The court below rendered judgment for defendants; and the plaintiff appeals from the judgment upon the judgment roll, there being no bill of exceptions.

The court found that the amount of money for which appellant claims a lien had been fully paid and satisfied; and the main question in the case is about the application of certain payments.

The facts necessary to be stated, as they appear in the findings, are these: The respondent Cordano, being the *442owner of certain land, made a written contract with one MacBain, by which the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Westwood Building Materials Co. v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Westwood Bldg. Materials Co. v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Kubatzky v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Edwards v. CurryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Modesto Building & Loan Ass'n v. WyldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API