J. S. Schirm Co. v. Rollingwood Homes Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.
Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment in its suit to foreclose a claimed lien for materials furnished to certain houses constructed for defendant on the latter’s land. For reasons which will appear we have concluded that the trial court erred in its determination that plaintiff had been paid in full for such materials, and that the judgment should be reversed.
Defendant Rollingwood Homes Company, hereinafter called Rollingwood, owner and developer of 127 lots of land (known as tract 21269) in Los Angeles County, contracted with Walter R. Sant and Sons (hereinafter sometimes called Sant or…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Westwood Building Materials Co. v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Wells v. Planters Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1959
- Westwood Bldg. Materials Co. v. ValdezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Edwards v. CurryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Modesto Building & Loan Ass'n v. WyldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Post Bros. Construction Co. v. YoderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Northern Virginia Savings & Loan Ass'n v. J. B. Kendall Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1964
- Rural Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Hope Dale Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Brown Wholesale Electric Co. v. Beztak of Scottsdale, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
- B. & J. Construction Co. v. Spacious Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.