First National Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.
This is an action to recover damages for the conversion of a quantity of wheat. The court found in plaintiff’s favor, denied a motion for a new trial, and the defendant and the intervener have joined in an appeal.
In December, 1922, intervener entered into a contract with one Leiseth for the operation of intervener’s farm from March 1, 1923, to March 1, 1926. In form the contract was not materially different from the one involved in Clark v. Cargill Elev. Co. 158 Minn. 429, 197 N. W. 845, and in the cases cited there. It provided that the intervener, should have and retain possession…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
- Davis v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Denison v. SawyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Clark v. Cargill Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Fithian v. WeidenboknerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3Cited by9 opinions
- Devereaux Mortgage Co. v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Schnirring v. StubbeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Lapadat v. Clapp-Thomssen Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Massey-Harris Harvester Co. v. Moorhead Farmers Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Lidenberg v. Anchor Stove Range Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.