Legal Opinion

Denison v. Sawyer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 14, 1905No. Nos. 14,340—(39)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Jackson county, Quinn, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, J.2

Action in claim and delivery to recover the possession of certain crops, in which, after trial before the court without a jury, judgment was ordered for defendants, and plaintiff appealed from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The short facts in the case are as follows: Plaintiff owned the land on which the crops in question were raised, and one Hoff had been cultivating the same under a lease or farm contract prior to and during the year 1901. It is claimed by plaintiff that under and by virtue of the terms of this contract he was the sole owner of all the crops *418raised on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Strangeway v. EisenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Anderson v. ListonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Evans v. Winona, Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Potts v. NewellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. C. S. Brackett Co. v. LofgrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. National Bank of Wheaton v. ElkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Julian v. YeomanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. First National Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  5. Blake v. J. Neils Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API