Legal Opinion

Clark v. Cargill Elevator Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 1924No. 23,835PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Taylor, C.

This action grows out of a dispute as to whether a quantity of wheat raised by plaintiff on the farm of the intervener under a cropping contract belonged to plaintiff or the intervener. The defendant paid the value of the wheat into court and the contest is solely between the plaintiff and the intervener. The court directed a verdict for the intervener and plaintiff appealed from an order denying a new trial.

The contract, with one exception, is similar to the cropping contracts considered in several previous cases- It provided that plaintiff should farm the land, harvest and secure…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McNeal v. RiderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  2. Strangeway v. EisenmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  3. Anderson v. ListonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  4. Henry v. HutchinsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  5. Avery v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. In Re Estate of OvervoldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API