Legal Opinion

Fithian v. Weidenbokner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 20, 1898No. Nos. 11,201-(218)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Hennepin county, Tarbox, J., denying, a motion for a new trial.

1Per curiam

Action brought to recover a balance claimed to be due on account of work and labor performed by plaintiff, as a clerk, for defendant, at her request. The trial was by the court without a jury, and its conclusion of law, upon the facts found, was that plaintiff was entitled to judgment for $127.97, with interest. There may have been an error of about $7 in plaintiff’s favor in the computation made by the court, but otherwise the findings were justified by the evidence.

No effort was made below to correct this error, and the order denying a new trial stands affirmed.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. First National Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927