Legal Opinion
Lapadat v. Clapp-Thomssen Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 23, 1986No. C7-86-610PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Marianne Lapadat, a real estate agent, appeals the trial court’s order finding that she is not entitled to commissions on real estate closings which occurred after her termination. We affirm.
FACTS
Marianne Lapadat has been a licensed real estate agent in Minnesota for 12 years. Clapp-Thomssen Company is a commercial and residential real estate brokerage corporation.
Several times in early 1980, Clapp-Thomssen offered Lapadat a sales position, but she declined. Later that year, Clapp-Thomssen obtained an exclusive brokerage contract for the Woodbury Hills townhome project…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pine River State Bank v. MettilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Tonka Tours, Inc. v. ChadimaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Frank Buysse, Cross-Appellee v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- First National Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Bradley v. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Guercio v. Production Automation Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In re American Resource & Energy, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Deerson v. Metal-Matic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Rosenberg v. Heritage Renovations, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004