Harris v. Hirschfeld
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant B. W. Downs after the trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend..'The complaint alleged that:
A
Subsequent to June 20, 1934, plaintiff and defendant Hirschfeld conducted a business and manufactured cosmetics and other toilet articles pursuant to an agreement, which after providing for the advancement and repayment of a sum of money to plaintiff, read in part as follows:
“Both parties hereto agree to use and devote their best efforts and endeavors towards making a success of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- McGuire v. GerstleySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- McCauley v. EyraudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- MacKlin v. Robert Logan AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Rose v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Lyon v. MacQuarrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Glassell v. PrentissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.