Legal Opinion

Harris v. Hirschfeld

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 10, 1936No. Civ. 10791PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant B. W. Downs after the trial court sustained a demurrer to plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend..'The complaint alleged that:

A

Subsequent to June 20, 1934, plaintiff and defendant Hirschfeld conducted a business and manufactured cosmetics and other toilet articles pursuant to an agreement, which after providing for the advancement and repayment of a sum of money to plaintiff, read in part as follows:

“Both parties hereto agree to use and devote their best efforts and endeavors towards making a success of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moropoulos v. C. H. & O. B. Fuller Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  2. McGuire v. GerstleySupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. McCauley v. EyraudCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wise v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. MacKlin v. Robert Logan AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Rose v. AmesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Lyon v. MacQuarrieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Glassell v. PrentissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API