Legal Opinion
Shochat v. Weisz
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 21, 1991No. CV-87-0935 (ADS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The defendant in this securities litigation moves pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c) for judgment on the pleadings and also for summary judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) and (c), as to all of the causes of action asserted against him in the complaint. The plaintiffs cross-move pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a), for leave to amend the complaint to withdraw one of the causes of action and also to increase the amount alleged in the ad damnum clause.
For the reasons that follow, the defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted, and the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re AnnTaylor Stores Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- International Paving Systems, Inc. v. Van-Tulco, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Cuccolo v. Lipsky, Goodkin & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Ahmed v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Violette v. Armonk Associates, L.P.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.