Legal Opinion
Cuccolo v. Lipsky, Goodkin & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 13, 1993No. 92 Civ. 2716(CES)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
STEWART, District Judge:
Defendants Lipsky, Goodkin & Co. (“LGC”), Mark Lipsky, Alan Greenblatt and Robert Rochlin move, pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Fed.R.Civ.P.”) 12(b) and 9(b), to dismiss the amended complaint of plaintiffs Anthony and Michelle Cuceolo. As set forth below, the motion is converted to one for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 and is denied in part and granted in part.
BACKGROUND
In 1975, the Cuccolos retained the accounting firm that eventually became defendant LGC, with whom defendants Lipsky, Greenblatt and Rochlin were…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kramer v. Time Warner IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- McDermott v. TorreNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Matana v. MerkinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Smith v. StacyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Unadilla Silo Co. v. Ernst & YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Vincent v. Money StoreDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- LaMure v. PetersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.