Legal Opinion

Safeco Insurance Companies v. Diaz

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 22, 1986No. C3-85-2229PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

Appellant Marie Ortega was struck by an automobile driven by defendant Joseph Diaz and owned by respondent David Diaz. Ortega commenced a personal injury action against both Joseph and David Diaz. At the time of the accident, Joseph Diaz was insured by respondent Safeco Insurance Companies (Safeco). Safeco brought this declaratory judgment action contending it did not have to afford coverage. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of both Safeco and David Diaz and against Ortega. Ortega appeals. We reverse.

FACTS

The factual bases for the trial court’s decision…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Plowman v. Copeland, Buhl & Co., Ltd.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Milbank Mutual Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Rosenberger v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. McCormick v. Custom Pools, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Beebe v. KleidonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lobeck v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  2. Stanek v. A.P.I., Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  3. Wondra v. American Family Insurance GroupCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  4. Marriage of Mitterhauser v. MitterhauserCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council No. 14 v. County of ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API