Legal Opinion
Stanek v. A.P.I., Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 27, 1991No. C8-91-453, CX-91-518PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Lac D’Amiante du Quebec, Ltee, formerly known as Lake Asbestos of Quebec, Ltd. (“LAQ”), moved the trial court to dismiss Stanley Stanek’s and Robert Lindholm’s personal injury lawsuits against it for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion. LAQ appeals from this order. 1 Stanek and Lindholm challenge the appealability of the order. LAQ moved this court to strike portions of Stanek’s and Lindholm’s brief. We affirm.
FACTS
Respondents Stanley Stanek and Robert Lindholm brought personal injury claims against miners of raw asbestos fiber and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- V.H. v. Estate of BirnbaumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Marshall v. Inn on Madeline IslandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- TRWL Financial Establishment v. Select International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- In Re Minnesota Asbestos LitigationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.