Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Carl R. Holden, deceased, brought this action against defendant to obtain the satisfaction or cancellation of a mortgage given by decedent and his wife, Anna Holden, as mortgagors. Decedent, prior to his death on November 19, 1942, had for many years operated a retail hardware store at Garvin, Minnesota, as a member of a partnership known as Holden & Hughes, which partnership is hereinafter referred to as the firm. Since 1927, the firm had bought merchandise on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- First National Bank v. HollinsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
- Gardner v. LeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Dvorak v. MaringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Northwestern National Bank of South St. Paul v. KrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Northwest Holding Co. v. EvansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.