Legal Opinion

Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 16, 1947No. 34,282PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Carl R. Holden, deceased, brought this action against defendant to obtain the satisfaction or cancellation of a mortgage given by decedent and his wife, Anna Holden, as mortgagors. Decedent, prior to his death on November 19, 1942, had for many years operated a retail hardware store at Garvin, Minnesota, as a member of a partnership known as Holden & Hughes, which partnership is hereinafter referred to as the firm. Since 1927, the firm had bought merchandise on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Geib v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  2. Hart v. BellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  3. State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
  4. First National Bank v. HollinsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  5. Gardner v. LeckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Dvorak v. MaringSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Northwestern National Bank of South St. Paul v. KrollSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  5. Northwest Holding Co. v. EvansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API