Legal Opinion
Santa Fe Village Venture v. City of Albuquerque
District Court, D. New Mexico
Decided August 30, 1995No. CIV 93-0233 MV/PJK/LFGPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge, Sitting by Designation.
THIS MATTER comes on for consideration of Defendant City of Albuquerque’s Motion for Summary Judgment filed February 7, 1994 (doc. 94) and Supplemental Motion for Summary Judgment filed July 5, 1995 (doc. 110). Plaintiff seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 and just compensation under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The City seeks summary judgment on several grounds: (1) limitations, (2) ripeness, (3) the lack of a compensable taking, (4) the lack of actionable conduct…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wilkinson v. Pitkin County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1999
- Ben J. v. City of SalinaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002