Legal Opinion
Wilkinson v. Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 4, 1998No. 96-1325PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel. We affirm. 1
I. Background
Plaintiffs own and seek to develop property, twenty-nine mining claims, in Pitkin County, Colorado, near the City of Aspen. They submitted three different land development applications to defendants, all of which were rejected. Plaintiffs filed two actions in state court, Nos. 89CV24 (“Wilkinson I”) and 93CV11 (“Wilkinson II”), challenging denial of the applications for various reasons including inverse…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Monahan v. New York City Department Of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- B. Willis, C.P.A., Inc. v. BNSF Railway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Evandro S. Santini and Santini Homes, Inc. v. Connecticut Hazardous Waste Management ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Vanover v. CookCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.