Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Luchun
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 1, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed May 14, 1991, which ruled that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because he had a reasonable assurance of continued employment.
Claimant worked 96 days as a substitute teacher for the New York City Board of Education during the 1989-1990 school year. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that because there was a reasonable assurance of continued employment for the 1990-1991 school year (see, Labor Law § 590 [10]), claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of GaetaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In re the Claims of WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Claim of WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- In re the Claim of ScullyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re the Claim of FeinermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matter of Cieszkowska (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- In re the Claim of SandickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Brannum v. District of Columbia Public SchoolsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
- In re the Claim of HammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998