Legal Opinion

In re the Clam of Bicjan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 7, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 23, 1994, which ruled, inter alia, that claimant was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits because she had a reasonable assurance of continued employment.

Claimant, a substitute teacher, was notified by her employer that her name appeared on the preferred list for the 1992-1993 academic year and that it intended to call her to teach during this period. In view of this, the Board found that she received a reasonable assurance of continued employment and, therefore, found her ineligible to receive…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. In re the Claim of HammondAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. In re the Claim of HuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. In re the Claims of GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API