Legal Opinion

Vaiuso v. Vaiuso

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 3, 1984No. (2850)PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.

This is an appeal 1 by the defendant from the judgment of the trial court dissolving the marriage of the parties. The defendant, on appeal, makes a wholesale attack on the trial court’s factual findings and conclusions. Because the trial court’s determinations are subject to limited review in domestic relations cases; Carpenter v. Carpenter, 188 Conn. 736, 739, 453 A.2d 1151 (1982); and because the trial court’s findings and conclusions are supported by the evidence on the whole record, we find no error.

The trial court found a number of facts as hereinafter discussed. The parties were married…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Palazzo v. PalazzoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  2. Chomko v. PatmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Manaker v. ManakerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  4. Eldridge v. EldridgeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  5. Elliott v. ElliottConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API