Vaiuso v. Vaiuso
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
This is an appeal 1 by the defendant from the judgment of the trial court dissolving the marriage of the parties. The defendant, on appeal, makes a wholesale attack on the trial court’s factual findings and conclusions. Because the trial court’s determinations are subject to limited review in domestic relations cases; Carpenter v. Carpenter, 188 Conn. 736, 739, 453 A.2d 1151 (1982); and because the trial court’s findings and conclusions are supported by the evidence on the whole record, we find no error.
The trial court found a number of facts as hereinafter discussed. The parties were married…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Weiman v. WeimanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Pisel v. Stamford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Pasquariello v. PasquarielloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Barnes v. BarnesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Palazzo v. PalazzoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Chomko v. PatmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
- Manaker v. ManakerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Eldridge v. EldridgeConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Elliott v. ElliottConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.