Legal Opinion
Manaker v. Manaker
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 28, 1987No. 5113PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
The defendant husband raises two issues in his appeal from the judgment dissolving the marriage between the parties. They are that the court erred (1) in admitting evidence of the financial resources of a third party who was living with the defendant, and (2) in requiring a standard of proof higher than a preponderance of the evidence in two instances. The plaintiff wife in her cross appeal claims the court erred in discharging her notice of lis pendens. We find no error in the defendant’s appeal and error in the plaintiff’s cross appeal.
The trial court in its memorandum of decision found the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kavarco v. T. J. E., Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
- McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- McGuinness v. McGuinnessSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Cookson v. CooksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Citino v. Redevelopment AgencyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Watson v. WatsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Dealmeida v. M.C.M. Stamping Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Freeman v. Alamo Management Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Jeffcoat v. JeffcoatCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.