Legal Opinion

Staiger v. Burkhart

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1985No. TC 131,718, CA A26533, SC S30895PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.

The issue is whether a motor vehicle liability insurer is entitled to an offset against its liability policy limits for the sum it has paid to an injured person as personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. We hold that the insurer is not entitled to the offset.

Plaintiffs 2 were passengers in a motor vehicle operated by defendant Lisa Burkhart in 1980. The vehicle was involved in a collision with another vehicle, and plaintiffs thereby sustained bodily injuries. Plaintiffs brought action against defendants Burkhart and others for damages for their bodily injuries.

Defendant Oregon Mutual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane County v. R. A. Heintz Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Monaco v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Kessler v. WeigandtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Northwestern Pacific Indemnity Co. v. CanuttOregon Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bauder v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Edwards v. Bonneville Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Farmers Insurance v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Bauder v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Ransom v. Radiology Specialists of the Nw.Oregon Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API