Legal Opinion
Edwards v. Bonneville Automobile Insurance
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided May 7, 1985No. TC A8012-06795, CA A24511, SC S30959PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLent, J.
The issue is whether, because of a provision in the policy, 1 the defendant motor vehicle liability insurer is entitled to an offset against its liability policy limits for the sum it has paid to an injured person as personal injury protection (PIP) benefits. 2 The provision is:
“Any payments made by the Company under this insurance either as benefits to or on behalf of injured person or as reimbursement, pursuant to ORS 743.800 to 743.835 inclusive, to any other insurer or organization for such benefits paid by it shall be applied in reduction of the amount of damages which, because of bodily…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kessler v. WeigandtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Staiger v. BurkhartOregon Supreme Court · 1985
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bauder v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Deschutes County Sheriff's Ass'n v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Garrett v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- Allstate Insurance v. Safeco InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Bauder v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.