Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 28, 2005No. F046106PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VARTABEDIAN, Acting P. J.

Stanley Marsh (Marsh) petitions this court to review the lawfulness of an opinion of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). (Lab. Code, 1 § 5950; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 57.) We are called upon to determine the applicability of the new apportionment provisions enacted by the 2004 workers’ compensation reform legislation under Senate Bill No. 899 (Sen. Bill 899) to a decision pending before the WCAB on reconsideration.

After a workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) found Marsh’s employer fully hable for Marsh’s disability award, the WCAB granted…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ballard v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Pullman Kellogg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Gee v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rio Linda Union School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Benson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. E & J Gallo Winery v. the Worker's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. County of Kern v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Brooks v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API