Gee v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VARTABEDIAN, Acting P. J.
Shelly Gee (Gee) petitions this court by a writ of review challenging the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB). The WCAB weighed the relevant medical evidence without applying the treating physician’s presumption of correctness under Labor Code 1 section 4062.9 because the parties failed to raise the presumption as an issue by the time of trial. We find the presumption operative as a matter of law whenever the underlying facts meet the presumption’s conditions. We therefore conclude the WCAB erred by not applying the presumption and remand…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- DuBois v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Garza v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Braewood Convalescent Hospital v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- LeBoeuf v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Department of Rehabilitation v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Bay Guardian Co. v. New Times Media LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Farr v. County of NevadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Rio Linda Union School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- City of Long Beach v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.