Pullman Kellogg v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Martin G. Normand suffered an injury to his lungs partially as the result of repeated exposure to harmful substances in his employment over a period of years. The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (board) awarded him benefits, and refused to apportion any part of his disability to nonindustrial causes, i.e., the circumstance that Normand had smoked a package of cigarettes a day for many years before he became disabled. Normand’s employer, Pullman Kellogg, and its insurance carrier, Eldorado Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to collectively as Pullman Kellogg) seek…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zemke v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Berry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Ballard v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Franklin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Bstandig v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings YarnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Brodie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Deschenes v. Transco, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Rio Linda Union School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.