United States v. Twining
District Court, D. New Jersey
On Rules to Show Cause Why Three Indictments against the Defendants Should Not be Quashed.
1Opinion of the Court
LANNING, District Judge.
At the September term of this court in 1903 an indictment was returned by the grand jury against Albert C. Twining, a director of the First National Bank of Asbury Park, charging him with, sundry offenses defined in section 5209 of the Revised Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3497]. A second indictment was returned against the same «defendant at the same term for subornation of perjury, under section 5393 of the Revised *130Statutes [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3654], and at the same term a third indictment was returned against the same defendant and one George F. Kroehl…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. RosenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- United States v. CobbanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Montana · 1904
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Amazon Industrial Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1931
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Alphonse PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- United States v. William Robert WrigleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. HeinzeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
- United States v. CrispinoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.