United States v. Farrington
District Court, N.D. New York
Motion to Quash Several Indictments.
1Opinion of the Court
Wallace, D. J.
The motions to quash these indictments may properly be considered together. The defendants are indicted severally for offences under section 5209 of the Revised Statutes of the United States. The defendants Leake and Farrington are charged with abstracting, embezzling, and misappropriating funds of the First National Bank of Saratoga, and making false entries on the hooks of the hank, they being officers of the bank. The defendant Richards is charged with similar offences as to the funds and hooks of *344the Commercial National Bank of Saratoga. The three cases were heard and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FassetSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1844
- Burdick v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- State v. FroisethSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
- Huidekoper v. CottonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1834
- Way v. ButterworthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Frank CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- United States v. RosenthalU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1903
- McGregor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1904
- People Ex Rel. Sears v. RomitiIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- United States v. GoldmanDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1928
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.