Legal Opinion

Widemshek v. Fale

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1962PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

The issues plaintiff raises on this appeal are whether he is entitled to recover damages, compensatory, nominal, or punitive, against defendant by reason of his failure to obtain a first mortgage on the property, and whether the negligent or fraudulent acts of the defendant entitled plaintiff to recover necessary attorney’s fees and other expenses that he incurred in seeking to establish the liability of defendant.

An attorney negligent in the performance of his düties to his client is liable for all the damages sustained as a proximate result of his negligence. 7 C. J. S., Attorney and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hasbrouck v. Armour & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Trimboli v. . KinkelNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Stephens v. WheelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Laehn Coal & Wood Co. v. KoehlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Bayerl v. SmythSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  2. Murray v. Holiday Rambler, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Tucker v. MarcusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  4. DeChant v. Monarch Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Basista v. WeirCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API