Bayerl v. Smyth
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
WolfsKeil, J.
Plaintiffs sued for alleged negligence of the defendant in the making and reporting upon a search against the title to property which they were acquiring through the medium of an exchange of real estate. The alleged negligence was the failure to report a judgment which was a lien against the property. There was judgment for the plaintiffs and defendant appeals.
The material facts in evidence were as follows: On February 5tli, 1930, the plaintiffs entered into an agreement with Frank Convertini and Ethel Convertini to exchange real estate…
2Cited by8 opinions
- St. Pius X House of Retreats v. CAMDEN DIOCESE NJSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, a New Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- Hoppe v. RanziniNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Keister v. TalbottWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
- Widemshek v. FaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.