Legal Opinion

Hasbrouck v. Armour & Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1909PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Winnebago-county: Geo. W. Burnell, Circuit Judge. The appeal is from an order sustaining separate demurrers of the respondents to appellant’s complaint. Among other references upon the part of the appellant were the following: 21 Am. & Eng.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the circuit court for Winnebago-county: Geo. W. Burnell, Circuit Judge. The appeal is from an order sustaining separate demurrers of the respondents to appellant’s complaint. Among other references upon the part of the appellant were the following: 21 Am. & Eng. Ency. of Law (2d ed.) 461, 462; Unset v. J. I. Case T. M. Co. 120 Eed. 865; Schubert v. J. B. Clark Co. 49 Minn. 331, 51 N. W. 1103,15 L. E. A. 818; Watson v. Augusta B. Co. 124 Ga. 121, 52 S. E. 152 ; Bright ¶. Barnett & B. Co. 88 Wis. 299, 60 N. W. 418, 26 L. E. A. 524; Cameron v. Mount, 86 Wis. 477, 56 N. W.…

1Opinion of the CourtTimlin, J.

The complaint averred that the respondent 'Armour & Co. is a corporation of Illinois, licensed to do business in this state, and the respondent S. Reymann Company is a Wisconsin corporation. The former is engaged in the manufacture and sale throughout this state of toilet soap, •and the latter is doing a mercantile business in the city of ■Oshkosh. Armour é Co. make and sell “Armour’s & Co.’s Toilet Soap No. 175” as a harmless article for the purpose of use in cleaning the face, hands, and body, and hold out to the public that this soap would supply every need for all toilet purposes, and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BighamTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Huset v. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  3. Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Loop v. . LitchfieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
  5. Bishop v. WeberMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. King Hardware Co. v. EnnisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  2. Ash v. Childs Dining Hall Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Smith v. Atco Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Koehler v. Waukesha Milk Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Cohan v. Associated Fur Farms, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API