Stephens v. Wheeler
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed April 5, 1927:
2Per curiam
Under our Code of Civil Procedure a “plea in abatement” to raise the question of whether the plaintiff’s action is premature is something of an anomaly. No specific provision for it is found in the statutes anywhere except that it is mentioned in sec. 355.09, Stats., as a method of raising objections to an indictment or information. Such a distinctly common-law plea was proper for a time in this state not only by the express preservation of the common law by sec. 13, art. XIV, Const., but by early legislative action, as is shown by sec. 6, ch. 93,…
3Cases cited27 opinions
- White v. E. T. Slattery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- Dutcher v. DutcherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
- Roberts v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Howell v. HowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Lawe v. HydeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by17 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,208 Myron Harris v. American Investment CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. DingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Wussow v. Commercial Mechanisms, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Widemshek v. FaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. First National BankDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.