Legal Opinion

Bleecker v. Miller

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 10, 1914No. 3060PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by John H. Miller and another, a partnership, etc.,, against T. Bache Bleecker. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLoofbourrow, J.

In this opinion the plaintiff in error will be hereafter referred to as defendant, and the defendants in error as the plaintiffs. The petition of plaintiffs alleges, in substance, that plaintiffs, John H. Miller and D. C. Miller, are now, and were at the times hereinafter mentioned, a partnership doing business in the city of Tulsa, Okla., under the firm name and style of the John H. Miller Company; that at and before the institution of this suit their business was that of buying and selling real estate on commission; that defendant, on or about the 20th day of October, 1908, listed with them…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Halsell v. Renfrow and EdwardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  2. Carlock v. CagnacciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Halsell v. RenfrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
  4. St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. RushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Pendleton v. ClineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Uhlmann v. Kin DawOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Continental Supply Co. v. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  4. Foster v. West Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Bolene Refining Co. v. Zobisch Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API