Byers v. Bourret
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Plumas. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
The plaintiffs, J. D. Byers and J. O. Hemler, allege themselves to be partners under the firm name of J. D. Byers & Co., and sue to recover the amount due on a promissory note executed by the defendant to them as such partners, which note was made payable to “ J. D. Byers & Co.”
The answer of defendant, in the nature of a plea in abatement, alleged that the plaintiffs had no right to maintain the action, for the reason that they had not complied with the provisions of sections 2466 and 2468 of the Civil Code, regulating the filing and publishing a certificate of the partnership.
*74The case Avas…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Bleecker v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- A. W. Swope & Son v. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- Phillips v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Sweeney v. StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Baker v. L. C. Van Ness & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.