Legal Opinion

Pratt-Low Preserving Co. v. Evans

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1921No. Civ. No. 2379PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The appeal is from a judgment in favor of defendant, rendered upon the sustaining of a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend. The contract, for a breach of which the plaintiff sued for damages, after designating the defendant herein as the party of the first part and the plaintiff as the party of the second part and after describing defendant’s land, proceeded as follows:

“That the party of the first part has sold and the party of the second part has bought, all the crop of fresh fruit grown or to be grown on the property hereinabove described, of the varieties and estimated…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. McCready v. . LindenbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. La Rue v. GroezingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Stuart v. PennisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  5. Klauber v. San Diego St.-Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1892

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kintner v. HarrMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Nelson v. SpenceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. William S. Gray & Co. v. Western Borax Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. Barrows v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. City of Glendale v. BarclayArizona Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API