Legal Opinion

City of Glendale v. Barclay

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1963No. 7460PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOCKWOOD, Justice.

The City of Glendale appeals from a judgment dismissing its suit for breach of contract against William Barclay and six other defendants, hereafter referred to as the appellees. For the purposes of this appeal, the well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint and all inferences which reasonably may be drawn therefrom are taken as admitted. Long v. Arizona Portland Cement Company, 89 Ariz. 366, 362 P.2d 741 (1961).

The City entered into a written contract with the appellees on January 7, 1958. This agreement contained the following terms: The appellees contemplated the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Vander Ploeg v. Van ZuukSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. De Hart v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Klauber v. San Diego St.-Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Sexauer v. WilsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. County Commissioners of Charles County v. ST. CHARLES ASSOCIATES LTD.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Kintner v. HarrMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Intaglio Service Corp. v. J. L. Williams & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. Higgenbotham v. TopelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  5. Gallagher v. BellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API