Legal Opinion

MENEES v. Andrews

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 13, 2004No. F044983PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAWSON, J.

This is an appeal from that portion of a judgment which awarded to respondent Todd Andrews, M.D. (Dr. Andrews), costs in the amount of $27,212.38 to reimburse him for expert witness fees. The trial court awarded these costs on the basis of Code of Civil Procedure section 998 (section 998), which provides in subdivision (c)(1); “If an offer made by a defendant is not accepted and the plaintiff fails to obtain a more favorable judgment. . ., the court. . ., in its discretion, may require the plaintiff to pay a reasonable sum to cover costs of the services of expert witnesses .…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Poster v. Southern California Rapid Transit DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Barella v. Exchange BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Santantonio v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Meissner v. PaulsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Vick v. DaCORSICalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Markow v. RosnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Westamerica Bank v. Mbg Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Peterson v. John Crane, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Licudine v. Cedars-Sinai Med. Ctr., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Prince v. Invensure Ins. Brokers, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API