Legal Opinion
Groves v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided November 12, 1993No. 156-89CPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARKINS, Senior Judge:
In this military pay case, plaintiff, formerly a major in the United States Army, seeks back pay and allowances that accrued following a conviction by general court martial on August 27, 1983, that was reversed on appellate review. All charges were dismissed and all findings and sentence were set aside on May 8, 1987. The complaint, filed March 22, 1989, invokes jurisdiction under the Tucker Act (28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)) and alleges pay has been denied pursuant to applicable statutes and regulations, including Army Regulations (AR) 135-91 and AR 104-10.1
I
Litigation of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Stuart Sargisson v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Albert Piccone v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Dilley v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Piccone v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sheridon H. Groves v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Carlisle v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Montiel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Verbeck v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014