Legal Opinion
Stuart Sargisson v. The United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 18, 1990No. 90-5034PublishedCited by 157 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MAYER, Circuit Judge.
Stuart Sargisson appeals the judgment of the United States Claims Court, No. 39-80C (October 13, 1989), that it was without jurisdiction to review the Secretary of the Air Force’s decision to release Sargis-son from active duty as an Air Force reserve officer. We affirm on other grounds.
Background
In 1962, Sargisson was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Air Force Reserve and began extended service on active duty. By 1974, he had been promoted to major. Because of a reduction in manpower requirements, the Secretary of the Air Force convened a Reserve Officer…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by157 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- John D. Holley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Daniel A. Lindsay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Dennis A. Dickson v. Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- James L. Murphy v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.