Legal Opinion

Ziegel v. Genesee County Board of Road Com'rs

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1927No. Docket No. 84PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

In improving, laying out and constructing county road No. 46 in Flint township, Genesee county, defendant board determined it necessary to take certain of plaintiffs’ lands and fixed the compensation, all in strict accord with the provisions of Act No. 352, Pub. Acts 1925, as amended by Act No. 92, Pub. Acts 1927. Plaintiffs had right of review by certiorari, but instead filed the bill herein to enjoin the defendants on the ground that the statutes mentioned are unconstitutional in limiting review to certiorari and not affording judicial review upon the questions of necessity for taking their…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bragg v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Hendershott v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. City of Allegan v. VonasekMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  3. New Products Corp. v. State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. In Re State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Chamberlin v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API