Hendershott v. Rogers
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
To reduce a curve in State trunk line highway, M 50, in Jackson county, defendant, • State highway commissioner, sought to take land of plaintiff pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 852, Pub. Acts 1925, entitled “An act to provide for the purchase and condemnation of private property for public highway purposes.” Defendant determined conclusively the necessity of taking the property without giving the plaintiff notice of the purposed determination and without affording him thereon a hearing, an opportunity to defend, and in this regard defendant followed, substantially, the provisions of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. DunlapMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
- Weimer v. BunburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
- Paul v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dation v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
- Thompson v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Fitzsimons & Galvin, Inc. v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Petition of RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Shizas v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.