Chamberlin v. Detroit Edison Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
Detroit Edison commenced condemnation proceedings in probate court pursuant to CL 1948, § 486.251 et seq. (Stat Ann § 22.1671, et seq.), hereafter the “public utility condemnation statute.” Thereafter this action was filed by the plaintiffs who are owners of property sought to be so condemned. Plaintiffs claim the public utility condemnation statute violates provisions of Michigan’s 1963 constitution and seek an injunction restraining Detroit Edison from continuing the probate court condemnation proceedings.
The 1908 constitution required that both necessity and just compensation be…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Housing Finance & Development Corp. v. FergusonHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Great Lakes Gas Transmission Ltd. Partnership v. MarkelMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
- State Highway Commission v. Great Lakes Express Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1973
- Basinger v. Provident Life & Accident InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- In Re Easterbrook EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.